Cognitive and human factors in digital forensics

Cognitive and human factors in digital forensics

Nina Sunde and Itiel Dror’s 2019 open-access article maps seven sources of cognitive and human error through the digital-forensics process. It distinguishes technical error from errors introduced by contextual information, expectations, organizational roles, and the examiner’s interpretation.

The article argues that digital forensics had paid insufficient attention to bias compared with other forensic disciplines. Suggested controls include a stricter scientific process, context management, exposure control, and compartmentalization of work.

The repository PDF was readable online during research but could not be downloaded into the wiki because its host was unavailable from the local runtime. The official article and repository URLs remain provisional evidence.

The source grounds Mobile-device extraction and evidentiary selection and its connection to Rättssäkerhet in Swedish criminal cases.

Sources

  1. doi.org
  2. sciencedirect.com
  3. phs.brage.unit.no