Dömda - om rättssäkerheten
Therese Juel’s Dömda - om rättssäkerheten examines Swedish cases in which investigation, defence, oversight, or judicial review allegedly failed. The imported 2019 EPUB includes footnotes and public case identifiers, making much of it more auditable than Fällda för sexövergrepp.
The book discusses the tendency of the Parliamentary Ombudsman and Chancellor of Justice to close individual complaints without reconstructing the underlying case, the practical difficulty of changing appointed counsel, and credibility reasoning in sexual-offence cases. Its extended accounts of Son Do and Esa Teittinen show how an early suspect can organize later witness interpretation, how omitted witnesses and misleading investigative claims matter, and how correction may require years of outside work even when the eventual result is acquittal after a new trial.
Juel writes from an explicitly critical position. Her factual claims should be checked against the cited judgments, case files, and official decisions before being used as independent proof. The book is used in Rättssäkerhet in Swedish criminal cases as a case-finding source and institutional critique.