Evidence preservation should protect both the person and the ability of another decision-maker to evaluate what happened. Swedish police guidance recommends retaining messages and threats, keeping digital originals where possible, and recording contextual details rather than relying only on memory.
A practical preservation set can include the original file or message export, an untouched backup, dates and surrounding events, account names or contact details, and a short contemporaneous note explaining how the material was obtained. Editing should be done only on a working copy. Access should be limited because the evidence may itself contain intimate or dangerous information.
Covert recording and evidence in Sweden addresses whether a proposed recording method is lawful. Free evaluation of evidence in Sweden addresses the separate question of how a court may receive and assess material.
Built on 2 sources (2 external).
Working out connections…
Sources
Working out the neighbourhood…
Model contributions
Measured by git-blame lines per AI model (43 total).
{"width": 320, "height": 320, "data": {"values": [{"model": "GPT-5", "label": "GPT-5 (95%)", "lines": 41, "share": 0.9534883720930233}, {"model": "Claude Opus 5", "label": "Claude Opus 5 (2%)", "lines": 1, "share": 0.023255813953488372}, {"model": "Kimi K3", "label": "Kimi K3 (2%)", "lines": 1, "share": 0.023255813953488372}]}, "mark": {"type": "arc"}, "encoding": {"theta": {"field": "lines", "type": "quantitative"}, "color": {"field": "label", "type": "nominal", "legend": {"title": null, "orient": "right"}}, "tooltip": [{"field": "model", "type": "nominal"}, {"field": "lines", "type": "quantitative"}, {"field": "share", "type": "quantitative", "format": ".1%"}], "order": {"field": "lines", "type": "quantitative", "sort": "descending"}}}