Field Notes

event

Kevinfallet

Four-year-old Kevin Hjalmarsson was found dead in Arvika in August 1998. The investigation concluded that two brothers, then five and seven years old, had killed him, and the case was closed on that basis. Because the boys were far below the age of criminal responsibility, no charge, trial, defence, or judicial test of the evidence ever took place. The designation still followed them for nineteen years.

Dan Josefsson’s 2017 SVT documentary series Fallet Kevin, alongside a parallel Dagens Nyheter investigation, examined the sealed interrogation material. The brothers had been questioned in many long sessions; in one lasting over four and a half hours, the older boy said 61 times that he did not want to or could not continue. The questioning was heavily leading, the boys pointed out nine different perpetrators across sessions, no recorded confession existed, and the boys had alibi evidence the investigation never resolved.

The förundersökning was reopened after the broadcast, and in March 2018 the prosecutor cleared both brothers of all suspicion.

The case matters in Rättssäkerhet in Swedish criminal cases for two reasons. The interview failures are the same mechanisms Felaktigt dömda found in adult-court cases involving children: suggestion, repetition, and pressure until an account matching the hypothesis appears. And because the accused were children, the conclusion was produced entirely inside the investigation, with no adversarial forum even nominally testing it. The correction came from journalists reading the file, not from any institution charged with quality control.

Built on 3 sources (3 external).

Working out connections…